{"id":107,"date":"2026-06-29T07:43:05","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T07:43:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/?p=107"},"modified":"2026-06-08T07:45:22","modified_gmt":"2026-06-08T07:45:22","slug":"tdv6-vs-sdv6-reliability-land-rover-diesel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/tdv6-vs-sdv6-reliability-land-rover-diesel\/","title":{"rendered":"TDV6 vs SDV6 Reliability: Which Land Rover Diesel Engine Wins?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The PSA and Ford-developed Lion V6 diesel family powered the backbone of the Land Rover and Range Rover lineup from 2005 through to 2018. Whether you are looking at a Discovery 3 (L319), a Range Rover Sport<\/a> (L320), or the later L494 generation, the choice between the earlier 2.7 TDV6 and the later 3.0 SDV6 remains one of the most debated topics among JLR owners and independent specialists alike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thesis:<\/strong> While the 3.0 SDV6 offers superior torque and refinement over the older 2.7 TDV6, its added complexity means that long-term reliability ultimately depends less on the engine block itself and more on the owner’s adherence to strict maintenance schedules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At JLR Engines, we specialise in reconditioning and rebuilding<\/a> your original engine rather than replacing it. Replacement is only recommended when the engine core is beyond economical repair – which represents a small minority of our work. This rebuild-first approach typically saves 40\u201350% compared to main dealer replacement costs while maintaining OEM-standard quality. In this comprehensive technical comparison, we will dissect the engineering realities, failure cascades, and long-term ownership costs of both engines to determine which diesel V6 truly deserves a place in your driveway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What These Engines Are: The Lion V6 Legacy<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

To understand the reliability of these engines, one must first understand their origins. The Lion engine family was a joint venture between Ford Motor Company and PSA Peugeot Citro\u00ebn, designed to compete with BMW and Mercedes-Benz in the premium diesel sector. Land Rover, then owned by Ford, inherited the engine for its heavy SUVs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 2.7 TDV6 (276DT)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Introduced to the Land Rover range around 2004\/2005, the 2.7-litre TDV6 (engine code 276DT) was a revelation for the brand. Producing 204 HP and 440 Nm of torque, it utilised a Compacted Graphite Iron (CGI) cylinder block. CGI is significantly stronger and more rigid than traditional grey cast iron, allowing for a lighter, more compact block that could withstand the immense cylinder pressures of a modern common-rail diesel. The 2.7 featured a single variable-geometry turbocharger, a Bosch common-rail fuel system, and a complex but robust chain-driven valvetrain. It was the default powerplant for the Discovery 3 (L319) and the first-generation Range Rover Sport (L320).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 3.0 SDV6 (306DT)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In 2009\/2010, Land Rover introduced the 3.0-litre SDV6 (engine code 306DT) to address the 2.7\u2019s perceived lack of low-end urgency and to meet tightening Euro 5 emissions standards. While sharing the same fundamental CGI block architecture and 90-degree V-angle, the 3.0 was heavily re-engineered. It featured a sequential twin-turbo setup, revised piezoelectric fuel injectors, an increased stroke, and an upgraded oil pump. Power outputs ranged from 245 HP to 256 HP, with torque swelling to a massive 600 Nm. This engine became the staple for the facelifted Discovery 4, the Range Rover Sport (L320 and early L494), and various Jaguar models.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Core Engineering Differences<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The leap from the 2.7 to the 3.0 was not merely a capacity increase; it was a fundamental shift in how the engine managed air, fuel, and stress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Turbo Setup: Single vs. Sequential Twin-Turbo<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The most significant reliability differentiator between the two engines is the induction system. The 2.7 TDV6 utilises a single, relatively large variable-geometry turbocharger. While it suffers from slight lag at very low RPMs, its simplicity is a major reliability asset. There is only one turbo, one set of oil feed and return lines, and one wastegate actuator to monitor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 3.0 SDV6 employs a parallel-sequential twin-turbo system. At low RPMs, only the primary (smaller) turbo operates, providing rapid spool-up and eliminating lag. As engine load and RPM increase, vacuum-operated changeover valves open to bring the secondary (larger) turbo into the circuit, eventually running both in parallel for maximum top-end power. While brilliant for drivability, this system introduces a labyrinth of vacuum lines, solenoids, changeover flaps, and additional heat sources. In our workshop, we commonly see the secondary turbo actuator arm seize due to carbon buildup and heat cycling, leading to limp mode and a loss of high-RPM power. Addressing these issues often requires expert turbo repair and replacement<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Drivetrain Stress and Torque Delivery<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Engineering an engine does not happen in a vacuum; the power must be transferred to the wheels. The 2.7 TDV6\u2019s 440 Nm of torque is well within the comfortable operating limits of the ZF 6HP automatic gearbox and the BorgWarner transfer cases used in the L319 and L320 chassis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 3.0 SDV6\u2019s 600 Nm of torque, however, places immense strain on the drivetrain. While the later ZF 8HP gearboxes are incredibly robust, the sudden application of 600 Nm – especially when modified or driven aggressively from a standstill – accelerates wear on the transfer case drive sleeve, the front differential crown wheel, and the propshaft universal joints. When evaluating long-term ownership costs, SDV6 owners must factor in the increased maintenance requirements of the transmission and driveline components that absorb this extra torque.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Block Internals and Oil Pump Design<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Both engines use CGI blocks, which are virtually indestructible under normal operating conditions. We rarely see cracked blocks or cylinder liner issues on the Lion V6, unlike the later 2.0-litre Ingenium diesels. However, the internal rotating assemblies differ. The 3.0 SDV6 features redesigned pistons with improved cooling galleries and an upgraded oil pump designed to flow higher volumes to cope with the increased thermal load of the twin turbos. Despite this upgrade, the fundamental routing of the oil pickup and the vulnerability of the sump strainer remain a shared weakness across both displacements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reliability Comparison: Where the Lion V6 Fails<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Neither engine is inherently “bad” when maintained correctly, but both have highly specific failure patterns that owners must monitor. Understanding these cascades is the difference between a minor repair and a catastrophic engine failure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Crankshaft Failure and Oil Starvation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The most feared phrase among Land Rover owners is “snapped crankshaft.” This issue affected both the 2.7 TDV6 and the early 3.0 SDV6, though it is more widely documented in the 2.7 due to its longer service life in the UK fleet. The failure rarely originates from the crankshaft forging itself; rather, it is the result of oil starvation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The timing chains on these engines are located at the rear of the engine, between the engine and the gearbox. As the plastic timing chain guides degrade over time and high mileage, they break apart. The plastic debris falls into the sump and is swept toward the oil pickup strainer. Once the strainer becomes partially or fully blocked, oil pressure drops. The main bearings – particularly bearings number four and five, which are furthest from the pump – begin to starve. The bearing material overheats, smears, and eventually seizes against the crankshaft journal. The immense rotational force of a diesel V6 then snaps the weakened, overheated crankshaft. We recently documented a full TDV6 crankshaft rebuild in our TDV6 crankshaft failure case study<\/a>, showing exactly how debris ingestion destroys the bottom end. When this occurs, our specialist crankshaft repair<\/a> protocols are required to save the engine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Timing Chain Stretch and Rear-Engine Complexity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Because the timing chains are located at the flywheel end of the engine, replacing them is a major undertaking. The engine must be physically removed from the vehicle, separated from the gearbox, and the rear timing cover must be dismantled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 2.7 TDV6 uses three chains: one primary chain driven by the crankshaft, and two secondary chains driving the cylinder heads. The 3.0 SDV6 uses four chains, adding a dedicated chain for the high-pressure fuel pump and oil pump drive. Both engines suffer from chain stretch and tensioner failure, particularly if the vehicle has been subjected to extended oil drain intervals. In our workshop, we commonly see timing chain wear appear after 90,000 miles on the 3.0 SDV6 if the original 24,000-mile oil intervals were followed. The tensioners rely on oil pressure to maintain chain tension; if the oil degrades and loses its viscosity, the chains slap against the guides, accelerating wear and generating the plastic debris mentioned above. Our SDV6 timing chain case study<\/a> highlights the critical nature of catching chain stretch before it jumps a tooth and destroys the valvetrain. Early intervention through a dedicated timing chain replacement<\/a> service is essential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Turbocharger Wear and Oil Feed Coking<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Turbocharger failures are common on both engines, but the root causes differ slightly. On the 2.7 TDV6, the primary culprit is the turbo oil feed pipe. This pipe contains a tiny mesh filter designed to catch debris before it enters the turbo bearings. Over time, heat and carbon cause the oil to coke (turn into solid carbon deposits), blocking the mesh filter. The turbo bearings are subsequently starved of oil, leading to shaft play, seal failure, and the ingestion of oil into the intake manifold – a condition that can cause a diesel engine to run away on its own engine oil.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 3.0 SDV6 suffers from the same oil feed coking, but it also faces the added complexity of the sequential turbo system. The vacuum lines that control the secondary turbo changeover valves become brittle and crack, and the actuators themselves seize due to extreme under-bonnet temperatures. Furthermore, if one turbo fails catastrophically, the resulting metal swarf is often ingested by the second turbo and the intercooler, meaning a single turbo failure on an SDV6 almost always necessitates a complete induction system flush and the replacement of both turbo units.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cooling System Plastics and Overheating<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If there is one universal truth across the entire Lion V6 family, it is the failure of plastic coolant pipes. Both the 2.7 and 3.0 utilise a plastic coolant crossover pipe that sits in the V of the engine, between the two cylinder heads, as well as plastic Y-pipes near the water pump and thermostat housing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Subjected to years of extreme heat cycling, the nylon material becomes incredibly brittle. Often, simply leaning on the pipe during routine maintenance, or the sudden spike in pressure during a hard motorway run, is enough to cause the plastic to shatter. When this happens, the engine loses its entire coolant capacity in seconds. If the driver does not immediately stop the vehicle, the aluminium cylinder heads will warp, the head gaskets will fail, and in severe cases, the cylinder heads will crack. A common mistake we see is assuming the 2.7 TDV6 is bulletproof because it’s older; in reality, its age means rubber components and plastic coolant pipes are now primary failure points regardless of mileage. If you catch this early, a coolant leak and overheating repair<\/a> can save the engine from total destruction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EGR Systems and Carbon Ingestion<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

To meet Euro 4 and Euro 5 emissions standards, both engines rely heavily on Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR). The 3.0 SDV6, in particular, features a complex water-cooled EGR cooler matrix and dual EGR valves. The soot-laden exhaust gases pass through the cooler, where they mix with oil vapour from the crankcase breather system. This mixture forms a thick, tar-like sludge that coats the intake manifold, the swirl flaps, and the EGR valve itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over time, this carbon buildup restricts airflow, causing rough idling, flat spots, and eventually triggering limp mode. In severe cases, the carbon can break off and be ingested into the combustion chamber, or the swirl flap mechanisms can fail, dropping metallic or plastic components into the engine. The 2.7 is slightly less prone to severe manifold choking due to its simpler single-valve setup, but neither engine is immune to the realities of modern diesel emissions equipment when driven primarily on short, low-speed journeys. Regular DPF, EGR and AdBlue cleaning<\/a> is highly recommended to prevent these carbon-related failures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pros and Cons Comparison Table<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

To distil the technical data into a practical ownership overview, the following table highlights the core trade-offs between the two engine variants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Feature<\/th>2.7 TDV6 (276DT)<\/th>3.0 SDV6 (306DT)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Power \/ Torque<\/strong><\/td>204 HP \/ 440 Nm<\/td>245-256 HP \/ 600 Nm<\/td><\/tr>
Induction System<\/strong><\/td>Single Variable Geometry Turbo<\/td>Sequential Twin-Turbo<\/td><\/tr>
Complexity<\/strong><\/td>Moderate<\/td>High (Vacuum lines, dual turbos)<\/td><\/tr>
Timing Chains<\/strong><\/td>3 Chains<\/td>4 Chains<\/td><\/tr>
Drivetrain Stress<\/strong><\/td>Moderate (Well within ZF 6HP limits)<\/td>High (Accelerates transfer case wear)<\/td><\/tr>
Towing Capability<\/strong><\/td>Good<\/td>Excellent (Superior low-end torque)<\/td><\/tr>
UK Rebuild Cost<\/strong><\/td>Lower (\u00a34,000\u2013\u00a36,500)<\/td>Higher (\u00a34,500\u2013\u00a38,000)<\/td><\/tr>
Primary Weakness<\/strong><\/td>Crankshaft snapping, plastic coolant pipes<\/td>Turbo actuator seizure, EGR carbon buildup<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Typical UK Rebuild Cost Comparison<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

When catastrophic failure occurs, understanding the financial reality of engine reconditioning is vital for making an informed decision. It is important to note that replacing these engines with a second-hand unit from a breaker is a significant gamble; because the entire Lion V6 family shares the same fundamental timing chain and oil pickup vulnerabilities, a used engine is simply inheriting the previous owner’s deferred maintenance. Reconditioning your original, numbers-matching engine remains the most reliable path forward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Typical UK rebuild costs for the 2.7 TDV6 generally range between \u00a34,000 and \u00a36,500<\/strong>, depending on crankshaft condition, timing chain damage, oil contamination, injector state, turbo condition, and whether the original block is reusable. The lower end of this bracket assumes the engine was diagnosed early – perhaps due to timing chain rattle – and the crankshaft journals are undamaged. The upper end accounts for a full crankshaft replacement, new OEM injectors, and a complete oil system flush following a turbo failure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the 3.0 SDV6, typical UK rebuild costs generally range between \u00a34,500 and \u00a38,000<\/strong>. The higher baseline cost is driven by the sequential twin-turbo setup. If oil contamination has occurred, both turbos must be replaced or professionally rebuilt, and the entire intercooler and intake system must be chemically flushed to remove metal swarf and carbon. Furthermore, the 3.0 requires more timing components and specialised gaskets during the reassembly process. Main dealer replacement for either of these engines frequently exceeds \u00a314,000, making specialist JLR services<\/a> the most economically sound choice for preserving the vehicle’s value. All UK rebuild costs vary based on the exact state of the engine core and current parts availability; please refer to our pricing disclaimer<\/a> for full details on how workshop variables affect final invoices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which Engine Suits Your Driving Style?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Reliability is not just about what breaks in a vacuum; it is about how the engine handles the specific loads and environments you subject it to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Towing and Heavy Load Carrying<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If your primary use case involves towing a twin-axle caravan, a horsebox, or a heavy car trailer, the 3.0 SDV6 is the undisputed winner. The 600 Nm of torque arrives low in the rev range and pulls relentlessly. The 2.7 TDV6 can certainly tow, but it requires significantly more throttle input and higher RPMs to maintain speed on inclines, which increases thermal load and fuel consumption. The SDV6\u2019s twin-turbo setup is specifically engineered to move heavy mass with minimal effort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Motorway and High-Mileage Commuting<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For high-mileage motorway use, both engines are exceptional. The Lion V6 was designed as an Autobahn cruiser. However, the 3.0 SDV6 offers a noticeably quieter cabin experience and superior gearing when paired with the ZF 8HP gearbox, allowing for relaxed, low-RPM cruising that keeps the engine well within its optimal thermal efficiency band. The primary risk for motorway miles is DPF (Diesel Particulate Filter) clogging if the journeys are not long enough to initiate passive regeneration, but this applies equally to both engines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Off-Road and Low-Speed Crawling<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For serious off-road use, the 2.7 TDV6 holds a slight, albeit unconventional, advantage. Its simpler single-turbo setup and lack of complex vacuum changeover valves mean there are fewer delicate components to fail when subjected to deep water crossings, thick mud, and extreme articulation. While the SDV6\u2019s torque is brilliant for rock crawling, the intricate vacuum lines and secondary turbo actuators are highly vulnerable to physical damage and water ingress in harsh environments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maintenance Practices That Dictate Lifespan<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The narrative that these engines are “ticking time bombs” is largely perpetuated by owners who treat them like modern petrol engines. The Lion V6 demands rigorous, preventative maintenance. If you follow the manufacturer’s original service schedules, you will almost certainly experience a major failure. If you adopt a specialist maintenance regimen, these engines can comfortably exceed 250,000 miles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Myth of Extended Oil Intervals<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When the 2.7 and early 3.0 were launched, Land Rover recommended oil drain intervals of up to 24,000 miles or 24 months to appeal to fleet buyers and reduce advertised running costs. This is entirely unsuitable for the UK driving environment, which consists of stop-start traffic, short journeys, and cold weather.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Extended oil intervals lead to the depletion of the oil’s detergent and anti-wear additives. The oil becomes acidic and thickens, leading to sludge formation in the sump and turbo feed pipes. More critically, the timing chain tensioners rely on clean, pressurised oil to function. Sludge blocks the tensioner pistons, allowing the chains to stretch and whip. We mandate an oil and filter change every 8,000 to 10,000 miles, or every 12 months, using only the correct manufacturer-approved low-SAPS 5W-30 synthetic oil. Adhering to a strict routine servicing<\/a> schedule is the single most effective way to prevent crankshaft and timing chain failures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Proactive Cooling System Upgrades<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Waiting for a plastic coolant pipe to fail is a recipe for a warped cylinder head. We strongly advise all Discovery and Range Rover Sport owners to proactively replace the original plastic coolant crossover pipes, Y-pieces, and thermostat housings with upgraded aluminium or reinforced composite alternatives during a major service or timing chain replacement. The cost of these preventative parts is negligible compared to the cost of machining cylinder heads and replacing head gaskets following an overheating event.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Warm-Up and Cool-Down Protocols<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Turbochargers spin at over 150,000 RPM and operate at extreme temperatures. The oil inside the turbo bearings acts as both a lubricant and a coolant. If you start a cold 3.0 SDV6 and immediately pull away under heavy load, the oil has not yet reached the turbos, causing immediate bearing wear. Conversely, if you complete a high-speed motorway run and immediately turn off the engine, the oil inside the turbo cartridges stops circulating. The residual heat from the exhaust manifolds “cooks” the stationary oil, turning it into hard carbon deposits that will eventually block the oil feed pipes. Allowing the engine to idle for 60 seconds before shutdown, and driving gently for the first three miles after a cold start, will double the lifespan of your turbochargers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Is the 3.0 SDV6 more reliable than the 2.7 TDV6?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Neither engine is inherently more reliable; they simply fail in different ways. The 2.7 TDV6 is mechanically simpler with fewer turbos and vacuum lines, making it cheaper to repair when things go wrong. However, early 2.7 models are more statistically prone to catastrophic crankshaft snapping due to early oil pump and timing chain design flaws. The 3.0 SDV6 addressed some bottom-end weaknesses but introduced highly complex twin-turbo and EGR systems that require meticulous maintenance to prevent expensive carbon and actuator failures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Do both engines suffer from crankshaft failure?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Yes, both the 2.7 TDV6 and the 3.0 SDV6 are susceptible to crankshaft failure, though it is less common on the later 3.0 models. The failure is rarely a defect in the crankshaft metal itself; it is almost always the result of oil starvation caused by timing chain guide debris blocking the oil pickup strainer in the sump, leading to main bearing collapse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which engine is better for towing a caravan or horsebox?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The 3.0 SDV6 is significantly better suited for heavy towing. Its sequential twin-turbo setup provides 600 Nm of torque low in the rev range, allowing the vehicle to pull heavy loads up steep inclines with minimal strain on the engine and gearbox, whereas the 2.7 TDV6 requires higher RPMs and more frequent gear changes to maintain momentum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How often should I change the oil on a Land Rover V6 diesel?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

You should ignore the manufacturer’s original extended service intervals of 16,000 to 24,000 miles. To protect the timing chains, turbochargers, and crankshaft bearings, we recommend changing the oil and filter every 8,000 to 10,000 miles, or every 12 months, using the exact specification of low-SAPS 5W-30 synthetic oil required for your specific vehicle year and DPF configuration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Can a snapped crankshaft be repaired?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In most cases of a snapped crankshaft, the engine block and cylinder heads remain perfectly intact. The engine can be removed, stripped, and the bottom end rebuilt with a new or reconditioned crankshaft, new bearings, and a full oil system flush. This reconditioning process is highly successful and significantly cheaper than purchasing a new crate engine from a main dealer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The debate between the 2.7 TDV6 and the 3.0 SDV6 ultimately comes down to a trade-off between mechanical simplicity and modern performance. The 2.7 TDV6 offers a robust, less complex ownership experience, provided you are vigilant about its cooling system plastics and bottom-end oiling quirks. The 3.0 SDV6 delivers the effortless torque and refinement expected of a premium Range Rover or Discovery, but it demands an owner who respects its complex induction system and adheres to strict, shortened oil change intervals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither engine deserves the “scrapyard” reputation they sometimes receive on internet forums. When treated with preventative maintenance and diagnosed early by specialists who understand the Lion V6 architecture, both engines are capable of immense longevity. All our specialist rebuilds include a comprehensive 12-month unlimited mileage warranty<\/a>, providing total peace of mind whether you choose to preserve your 2.7 or restore your 3.0.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Speak to a JLR specialist about your Discovery or Range Rover Sport by calling +44 203 488 4649. You can also contact our Billericay workshop<\/a> online, arrange national collection and delivery for your vehicle, or get a quote<\/a> for your specific requirements today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The PSA and Ford-developed Lion V6 diesel family powered the backbone of the Land Rover and Range Rover lineup from […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":108,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_edit_lock":["1780905833:3"],"_thumbnail_id":["108"],"_elementor_global_class_usage_indexed":["1"],"_elementor_page_assets":["a:0:{}"]},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":109,"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107\/revisions\/109"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/108"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jlrengines.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}